Posted on Friday 10 March 2006
(With apologies to Yogi Berra)
Stop me if you’ve heard this one:
- A team comes into the Delta Center with a long road losing streak, only to prove extremely tough (Yep, Boston found the answer to their road woes just a couple of weeks ago)
- A team builds a huge lead, only to give it all back when they hit 1 shot from the field in the fourth quarter (Sacramento did this last month).
- Larry Miller puts his foot in his mouth, thinking before he acts (See “Brokeback Mountain debacle, screaming at his team, etc.)
- The Jazz, after almost blowing the game, miraculously win (See Chicago, Sacramento, Monday night…)
See what I mean? The Orlando game was ripe with “Didn’t this already happen?” moments. Fortunately, that last one also came true, and the Jazz did indeed steal a victory. I can only imagine that they are excited to play again tonight, if only to quell some of the talk that has burned up the national and local news, talk radio, and message boards. After such a seemingly innocent game, there was much to hash out.
First, the Jazz were coming off of a pounding administered at the hands of the last-place Sonics, who had 38 fast break points and prompted Sloan to bench Memo and AK. I was at our family Oscar party, and actually making homemade root beer at the time, so I was spared from watching THAT mess. So when Orlando rolled into town, it seemed like a good opportunity to put that behind them. And they did…for three quarters. They had a 15-point lead going into the fourth quarter, and against a crummy team like the Magic, at home, double-digit lead, you absolutely HAVE to put the game away. That’s when the old lid got clamped on the basket, and suddenly, it’s a tie ball game. What scared me the most was not the missed field goals, because teams will go cold from time to time (especially the 29th-ranked offense), it was the continuation an alarming trend of missed free throws. It is a just a lack of concentration, in my opinion, and the Jazz have a small enough margin of error on the offensive side of the ball that they don’t need to give points away like they have in the last half dozen games. Everytime a Jazz player misses a free throw, my wife says “If I made that much money playing basketball, I’d make at least 90% of my free throws”. I’d actually be happy with the 75-80% across the board, but I get her point.
So now the stage is set…26 seconds left, tie ball game, timeout…and here comes Larry across the court (presumably weaving through the Jazz Dancers) to scream at Kevin O’Connor and Dennis Haslam. Now Larry wears his heart proudly on his sleeve. He cries just a little LESS easy than Dick Vermeil, and just a little MORE easy than any female watching “The Notebook”. You always know where you stand with him. But this seemed like a really strange time to air his dirty laundry, especially considering the Jazz WON the game. I belive that the owner has all the right in the world to yell at his players and coaches, but how is that anything but a huge distraction when they are trying to win a pretty crucial game? Here’s my theory: Larry was fed up with every smarmy talking head on ESPN, ESPN radio, local guys, etc. laughing it up about Kirilenko’s wife revelation that she gives him a “one night per year allowance”. The votes for “Wife of the year”, the obligatory “I wonder what my wife would say if I asked her”, all of these were cheap laughs, not all that funny, and VERY tired after about three days. So Larry decided to give them all something else to talk about.
While I didn’t see it personally, and Larry has tried to downplay his actions (which he normally does when he cools down), it was a big enough deal that Jim Rome, PTI, Dan Patrick, etc. all commented on what happened and weighed in with their opinions. I don’t think it was a Cuban-esque performance, but he’s one of only a handful of owners who seem to make headlines for something or other. Again, he’s writing the checks, and he’s entitled to say what he wants. But his actions would not garner nearly as many headlines if he acted less impulsively (just like that whole “Brokeback Mountain” debacle).
Two things to bring from all of this:
1. I don’t think that Larry will be owning the team a whole lot longer. He is just too much of a fan. And I don’t mean a jock-sniffing fan, a real genuine fan. Plus, he’s a businessman, and when he doesn’t feel like his money is being invested wisely, he’ll get out. Larry needs to have his courtside seats, come to the game, and go home after, either elated or upset like the rest of us, and let someone else lock up and turn off the lights. He should go watch his new racetrack get built, or hang out with his other team, the Stingers. Minor league baseball is night and day compared to the NBA. When I was in high school, my buddies and I went to see the Salt Lake Trappers win their championship. Celebrity part-owner Bill Murray threw the first pitch over the backstop, they played that recording of Frank Layden singing “Take Me Out To The Ballgame”, and when they had won, we were waiting for everyone to run onto the field and celebrate so that we could too. But nobody did. Everyone was just there for a good time. Heck, I’ve even taken a multi-inning nap on the grass in left field before, but that’s a story for another time. Now, if some high-priced player is at Franklin Covey, they’re probably on a rehab assignment from the Angels, and someone else is paying their inflated salary. Larry needs to go sit in his owner’s box, watch the sun set, and relax.
2. I think that Jerry will ride off into the sunset at the end of the year. And before I get into this, I would like to state for the record:
- I love Jerry Sloan
- I love that his nickname was the “Chainsaw”
- I love that when the guy he guarded dribbled between his legs, Sloan would knock him to the ground.
- I love when the courtside mikes pick up his distinctive voice dropping F-bombs. He also makes it easy to read lips.
- I love his integrity, and his passion.
Jerry has been here for almost every glorious moment in Jazz history. He brought the team to the brink of a championship two years in a row. Some say that his teams underachieved, that they should have something to show for having two of the 50 greatest together for 13 years. And while I would love to have seen the Jazz get all the way to the top of the mountain, He whose name will not be spoken was reigning at the time, and there were plenty of players who didn’t get their due because they were playing in the NMJBA. Even in their best years, the Jazz were still just Stockton, Malone, a valient-but-aging Hornacek, and 9 role players. Most years they didn’t even get picked to win their division at the start.
All that said, here are the two things that I HATE about Jerry:
First, he refuses to change his ways. I understand that consistency is a necessity, but so is a little evolution. When those stellar Jazz teams kept getting knocked off in the 90’s, Jerry stayed with the “double team the post, and let them swing the ball around the arc to a wide open three-point shooter”, even after getting burned. Hey, we held Hakeem to 18 points. Too bad Kenny Smith, Eddie Johnson, and Robert Horry hit a combined 65 three-pointers. And nowadays, the league has changed. Defense is always going to be at a premium, but the offensive side of the ball has changed. Jerry still wants to throw it to someone on the low block every trip down the court and point and make that silly illegal defense motion. But it’s a guard’s league now. The Lebron/Dwyane/Kobe mold is what teams are molding themselves around. On any given night, the Jazz offense can purr like a NASCAR engine, but when you’re 29th out of 30 teams in offense, there is certainly room to improve.
Second, Jerry does not seem to be very good at dealing with young players. I don’t know if he just can’t relate to them or what, but they don’t seem to get the playing time that they need to develop. If Jerry leaves at the end of the year, it will be very interesting to see how D-Will and the other young guys develop. Should be interesting!
